Home
Elder Law
Wills and Trusts
Estate and Estate Tax Planning
Charitable Tax Planning
FAQs
Bio
Resources
Articles
Contact Us

Florida Supreme Court Overrules Fourth District Court of Appeals Regarding Homestead Property in Will

The Florida Supreme Court recently ruled homestead property that is not addressed in a specific bequest passes to the residuary beneficiaries – not the general or specific beneficiaries – when the decedent is not survived by a spouse or minor children.

Henry McKean, who had no surviving spouse or "minor" children at the time of his death, made a bequest in his will for his nephew, Peter Warburton to receive $150,000 in cash. Mr. McKean made additional specific bequests, and also provided that his residuary (remaining) property be left to his half brothers.

Mr. McKean had a condominium that qualified as a "homestead" under Florida law thereby protecting it from forced sale. Unfortunately, without selling the homestead, there were not enough funds in the estate to fulfill Mr. McKean's monetary bequests.

Because enough cash was not available, the court was called upon to determine who would receive the homestead property. Could it be sold and the proceeds used to fulfill the monetary gift of $150,000 to nephew Peter, or, should it pass as "residuary" property and be awarded to Mr. McKean's half brothers?

In making its determination, the court relied heavily on ascertaining the intent of the testator, and on Snyder v. Davis, 699 So.2d 999 (FL 1997). Although the question posed to the court in Snyder differed from that of McKean, the facts of the case were essentially the same. Additionally, the court reviewed Florida law and determined, "nothing in the statutes indicates that the protected homestead should be distributed as part of the decedent's estate."

Thus the Florida Supreme Court ruled, since Mr. McKean had not specifically stated his homestead could be sold and the proceeds added to the estate, the sale of his property to generate funds to fulfill a cash inheritance could not be forced. Consequently, the condominium passed as residuary property to Mr. McKean's half brothers.

Source: McKean v. Warburton (FL Supreme
Ct., No. SC04-1243, 9-8-05)

home | elder law | wills and trusts | estate and estate tax planning | charitable tax planning
faqs | bios | resources | news and articles | contact us

Serving Worcester County, including Worcester, Shrewsbury,
Northborough, Westborough, Sturbridge, and Harvard

© Copyright Smith Worthington, LLC, Counsellors-at-Law
102 Shore Drive, Suite 100 Worcester MA 01605
Just across the street from the Greendale YMCA. Plenty of free parking.
Phone: 508-853-1900 Fax: 508-853-1777
Email: markw@ma-estateplanning.com Web: www.ma-estateplanning.com

The material on this page or email messages sent to markw@ma-estateplanning.com
does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney client relationship.

Certified as an Elder Law Attorney by the National Law Foundation, a private non-profit organization accredited by the
American Bar Association, but whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.